Showing posts with label participation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label participation. Show all posts

Monday, September 21, 2009

Charles Leadbeater presentation in Brisbane for EIDOS 21 Sept

I had a 5am start this Monday morning to get in the car and head 50km to Brookwater Golf Club for breakfast at 7am on a Monday morning, as you do. The reason why myself at 99 other luminaries hit the Ipswich Motorway this morning was to hear the British writer, thinker and former Blair government advisor Charles Leadbeater present on The User-Generated State: Public Services 2.0.

The presentation was brought to us by the EIDOS Institute, headed by Bruce Muirhead, and with participation from a number of universities (including QUT) and industry participants.

I had the opportunity to meet Charles Leadbeater when he was in Brisbane as part of the launch of the QUT Creative Industries Faculty in 2002, so it was great to hear him again, even at what appeared to be an unlikely venue at an unlikely time (a few golfers could be spotted at the club among the more formally dressed attendees).

The gist of Charles's presentation could be summarised as saying we are entering into a third age of thinking about public services. The first, which characterised the post-WWII welfare state, was driven by need. Services needed to be delivered to people, and questions of quality were subordinated to the importance of delivery. The second was driven by want, or people exercising power as consumers (encouraged by government policies and philosophies of the 1980s and 1990s) to demand more responsive and personalised services. In the third stage, the key word is can - can the service provider give me a voice in this, and can I take some personal responsibility over how this is provided?

What follows is that thinking in terms of service delivery is not enough. There needs to be more emphasis on three C's:
  • Collaboration between service providers and citizen-consumers;
  • Conversation - particularly in times of greatest need, people don't want a purely transactional model, but want someone to talk with;
  • Capability - how can a service be provided in such a way that the need to provide it dminishes after a certain point, as people have got more control over their own affairs.
Leadbeater cautioned that people who claim they want to do something for you often want to do something to you. He gave the example of his Personal Funds manager, whose friendliness belies the fact that he wants some of his cash in service fees. Rather than thinking in terms of for and to, it is recommended that thinking be in terms of with. Participation is where leading edge thinking about the future of public services is, according to Leadbeater.

This also necessitates a shift of thinking away from the institution as the starting point. His example from cultural policy was that the building of cultural institutions (fixed infrastructure with high up-front costs) is often the starting point of this sector, but that there is obviously a plethora of "culture" that happens well away from these institutions (You Tube, Facebook etc.), that is lower-cost and more distributed, participatory and agile.

NB: Charles Leadbeater took up some of these themes in a recent article in The Guardian.

Update: Charles Leadbeater's talk can now be accessed from You Tube.

Monday, May 25, 2009

Friday, December 19, 2008

News and Information as Digital Media comes of age

The Berkman Centre for Internet and Society at Harvard University has published a series of papers, blogs, discussions, videos etc. around the theme of Media Re:Public: News and Information as Digital Media Comes of Age.

There are papers on international news, new media literacy, public broadcasting, digital media and democracy, mainstream news and the networked public sphere, as well as a series of case studies on the site. The underlying premises of Media Re:Public are:
• Public participation in the media, enabled by the Internet, is a burgeoning and evolving phenomenon that has both positive and negative effects.
• Dramatic changes in the traditional news media are occurring in parallel to the rise in participation, primarily due to the disruption of their business models by new distribution systems.
• Simple dichotomies—new vs. old, mainstream media vs. blogosphere—do not accurately describe the current environment, with its complex interdependencies among media entities with different structures and motivations. The distinctions between professional and amateur are blurring, and the definitions of commercial, public, and community media are shifting.
From the Overview paper, authored by Persephone Miel and Robert Faris, some key points are:
  1. Under pressure from falling revenues and the disruption of their business model, traditional media outlets are reducing and shifting the scope of their original reporting.
  2. Web-native media entities are not addressing all of the crucial reporting gaps left by traditional media. Current structures and mechanisms do not provide sufficient incentives for them to do so.
  3. In the changing media environment, news consumers risk relying on news sources that are neither credible nor comprehensive.
  4. Participation in the online media space is not evenly distributed; some populations and ideas remain underrepresented.
  5. There are elements of critically important journalism that have not yet found reliable sustainability models in the online media environment.
  6. Efforts to understand and address these issues are limited by a lack of solid empirical evidence, and must rely instead on incomplete information, anecdotes, and intuition.
For more read here.

Friday, November 21, 2008

User-generated Content and SBS


User-Generated Content and SBS



User-Generated Content and SBS
View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: sbs ugc)



Presentation given by Georgie McClean, Heidi Lenffer and I on user-generated content strategies and issues for the Special Broadcasting Service. It is based on the research undertaken by Heidi Lenffer as part of an MA (Research) at QUT.

Paper presented to Centre for Media and Communications Law annual conference, "Media, Communications and Public Speech", University of Melbourne, 20-21 November, 2008.



SlideShare Link

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Presentation to CPRF 2008


2008 CPRF Presentation







Presentation with Jason Wilson to 2008 Communications Policy Research Forum, UTS, Sydney, 29-30 September. The full paper can be found here.


SlideShare Link

Friday, June 27, 2008

Citizen Journalism paper at CCI Conference

The ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation has now completed its conference Creating Value: Between Commerce and Commons. It was a very successful event, with over 180 delegates enjoying three days of lovely Brisbane winter sunshine and a very strong range of keynote presentations, papers and panels. If you want a blow by blow, panel by panel conference description, check out Axel Bruns' fabulous blog.

The paper that I presented was co-authored with Jason Wilson, and was titled "Citizen Journalism and Political Participation: The Youdecide project and the 2007 Australian Federal Election". It reported on the youdecide2007.org project, and the full paper can be found at the QUT ePrints site.

A summary of our main points in evaluating this project against the objectives set for it is:

1. Promoting citizen participation in Australian politics
  • Good range of contributions, site visits (about 12-16,000 a week) across 50 electorates
  • Biggest story was 'crate gate affair' concerning MP for Herbert, Peter Lindsay
  • 40% of registrants were from Queensland
  • Didn't get participants from some key electorates (e.g. Wentworth and Bennelong)
  • Localism is a key issue to consider as Queensland Decides site attracted as much participation in early 2008
2. Promoting citizen engagement in the policy process
  • Not really - it was more a news site than a deliberative site
  • Context of a Federal election may have been a factor here
  • Uneven buy-in from political organisations (Liberals did not get involved at all)
  • Site design issues may have been a factor
3. Building top-down/bottom-up links between mainstream and online independent media
  • Good range of references in mainstream media, both to stories and to project itself
  • You Decide TV program on Briz 31 attracted about 16,000 viewers on a Friday night (can still be viewed on YouTube)
  • Club Bloggery site established on ABC Online on back of collaborative Gatewatching site
  • Didn't make link with SBS as project partner
4. Broadening base of political participation beyond the 'political junkies'
  • Didn't happen - very much a site for the already politically engaged