State of the Industry Conference - Graeme Turner presentation

Live blogging from the State of the Industry conference at the University of NSW, hosted by the Cultural Research Network.

Professor Graeme Turner, Convenor, Australian Research Council Cultural Research Network, and University of Queensland

• Problem of how to replenish the academic labour market as up to 50% of "baby boomer" academics retire over the next decade;
• The market will be increasingly internationally competitive - arts & humanities generate a lot of PhDs, but there are slower completion rates, higher attrition rates and more discontent with casualisation of work than in other Faculties/disciplines/sectors;
• This will be approached as "the university's problem" but it is increasingly one for government;
• The myth of "lots of jobs in the near future" has been around "since Graeme was 25" - beware of that mantra, although it may be more true this time.

Issues that need addressing and their attendant causes:

1. Perpetuation of casual/sessional appointments - originally designed to eliminate "exploitative" contract employment, but is itslef more exploitative;
2. Collapse of discipline-based departments;
3. Exploitative behaviour by unviersities and departments and resultant loss of trust;
4. Low level of PhD stipends and effects on personal living conditions esp. for those with families;
   
5. The end of the Masters degree as a PhD training ground - requires too much to be done with inexperienced PhD candidates;
6. Anti-intellectualism in Australia and disapraging of people in universities;
7. Increasing vocationalisation of universities, and use of "interdiscplinarity" to develop economies of scale by forcing disciplines together;
   
8. Marketisation of univerisites and short-term responses to shifts that see wholesale disappearance of disciplines and departmentsesp. outside of metro universities and G8 universities (seen in ERA exercise, soon to be public);
9. Poor advice from research offices and other entites trying to "second guess" where the funding will be e.g. whole Faculties being told to submit ARC grants.

Such factors influenced the decision to set up the CRN. Aims were to:

• link up senior reserachers with PhDs and ECRs;
• enable grassroots development of research ideas;
• build collaborations across disciplines and build multidisciplinary teams;
• address problems associated with professional development and lack of institutional mentoring for ECRs;
• liberate researchers from constraints of their particular institutions and departments by linking up to a wider communtiy of scholars.

Issue of how not simply to draw attention to constraints but build capacity for collective agency c.f. presentations by Simon Marginson and Staurt Cunningham on Day One of State of the Industry conference.

Whta are the consequences of loss of capacity in the humanities generally over the last 15 years and the unevenness of critical strength across the sector? Capacity was largely built in the sciences, particularly during the Howard years.

Ongoing arguments about how to get government to take our claims seriously. Poor results in first round of Future Fellowships an illustration of the problems arising. Can become a "vicious cycle" since governments respond to evidence of results rather than special pleading for more cash.

Maintain a focus on the quality of your work, and not on short-term exigencies of research offices e.g. first-tier journals after ERA.

Notes from ICA conference 25 May

Notes below from today's ICA conference sessions. The anticipated fireworks from the Popular Communication session failed to materialise, as Toby Miller had to apologise and could not present his paper titled "Why the Creative Industries Must Die".

The IAMCR report for UNESCO will be available on the IAMCR Web site www.iamcr.org shortly.

Reassessing NAFTA and the Cultural Industries
Sunday 25 May 2008

Emile McAnany, “Television and Cultural Integrity: Historical Perspectives on Technology”

1. TV/video remains central;
2. Media industries are in transition – need for a historical perspective;
3. Technological change is more rapid than cultural change – implications for policy.

• What has/has not changed since 1994?
o Shift from broadcasting to the Web (Hulu – started by NBC and FOX – free TV series and movies) – content becoming freely available on the Web – universally available content in digital format downloaded either to the Web or (soon) to the TV
o Hollywood still the primary producer of content – major media companies adapting quickly to the Web.

• Conclusions
1. National policy remain central as values statements;
2. Difference between cultural policy and cultural resistance – the latter can only come from people, not governments;
3. Cultural production policies are very important – example of Korea.

Roger de la Guarde, “Television Flows rather than Trades”

• Shape of Quebec/Canadian TV has not been significantly changed by NAFTA. Major changes have come from:
o Technology and industry convergence
o Lack of assertiveness of regulators of national perspective
o Regulators permitting media concentration and convergence.

• Specialist channels now account for about 25-30% of audience share – was 5% when samples were being done of content of 10 channels in Quebec.

Jose Carlos Lozano, “Flows of Audiovisual Content in the NAFTA Era”

• 2006 – 100% of US content from US; Canada 58% local/42% US; Mexico 29% US/66% Mexico; 4% other
• Prime time : dominated by US in Canada – non-news in Canada dominated by US; Mexico – strong in telenovelas, news and other genres – films and sitcoms dominated by US.
• Cultural proximity and cultural discount are central to why figures differ for Canada and Mexico – Mexico did not seek cultural exemption in NAFTA.

Communication and Information: Critical Perspectives on IAMCR’s Research Agenda for UNESCO

Report on rethinking sustainable development in the context of knowledge societies:

Organising themes
o Cultural diversity
o Governance
o Media/info-structure/education
Sub-themes
• Human rights, communication and information
• Access and literacies
• Participatory communication
• Representation
• Strategic communication and information policies and action plans
• Indicators of knowledge societies

• Repertoire of research methodologies and methods

Cees Hamelink

• UNESCO/IAMCR link formed around context of 1970s NWICO campaigns for ‘right to communicate’ – MacBride Commission (1980) – fell apart in 1980s for political reasons (withdrawal if US, UK and Singapore 1985)
• 1990s – cultural diversity report – not promoted – late 1990s – missed boat on WSIS – given to ITU
• 2000s – Convention on Cultural Diversity – not supported by US – needed to become an instrument aligned to WTO language

Annabelle Sreberny

• Danger of repetition of 1970s debates which were focused on film and television, but now around ICT and knowledge societies – still a technologistic drive
• IAMCR can challenge some of the ‘normalising’ rhetorics that come from UNESCO – internationalizing still takes US and Europe as the baseline – developed versus developing/emergent/transitional/crisis-ridden etc.
• Media & communications research needs to dialogue with other disciplines more e.g. economics, political science, law.
• How do we nurture creative and cultural industries to promote cultural diversity and new businesses (petty bourgeoisie) in developing countries
• Rhetoric is too abstract and universalising and not grounded in time and place – wanting more grounded projects and empirical, bottom-up studies (e.g. media anthropology)
• Afghanistan – has plethora of development communications after war – now has 14 TV channels, each run by competing warlord interests – is this what was wanted? - contrast to Iran where slow process of democratization is happening, but is ignored for political reasons

Marc Raboy

• IAMCR report acknowledges difficulties of researching the global, but there may be a need to step back from current pragmatics to question of how to integrate recognition of greater diversity into a research perspective – lack of consensus about diversity, democracy etc.
• Moving beyond reports on what is currently being done to need to consider relationship between methodological nationalism/methodological cosmopolitanism (Ulrich Beck)
• Issues being defined at the global level need to be addressed at the local and national levels e.g. democracy and human rights
• Emergence of new institutional players in the debate – not only national governments and multilateral institutions but specific organizations of global civil society e.g. AMART has a 25 year history as a global community media organisation

Indrajit Banerjee

• Three core reasons/rationales behind this exercise:
1. Fundamental transformation of global media and communications landscape – mass communication systems in crisis
2. Deepening development crisis – focus needs to be on UNESCO framework of sustainable development
3. Inadequacies in communications research in relation to sustainable development.


Divina Frau-Miegs

• IAMCR presenting to UNESCO as an NGO and not just as a research organization – added value of transnational perspective – intermediations, transnationalisation (Sonia Livingstone)
• Civil society agencies taking global agendas back home since WSIS – how to localize global issues
• Reporting, assessment, tools, methodologies
• An alternative to normative concept of ‘development’?
• Different cultural diversity agendas – they should be complementary
o Western – employment
o African – identity
o Latin American & Asian – sustainability

Need to enable rather than dictate different local adaptation of these agendas.
Need to be prepared to ‘dirty our hands’ to contribute to social justice.

New Concepts, New Methods: The Challenges of Popular Communication Research in the 21st Century

John Hartley

• Rethinking representation to productivity – DIY/DIWO citizenship/identity (NB: never found out what DIWO identity was)
• Entrepreneurial consumers – audiences not just active but productive
• Revisiting active audience but not as product of industrial organization
• Culture, media and the popular at leading edge of innovation – cultural science
• www.cultural-science.org

Henry Jenkins

“How I Learned to Love Moby Dick, or when Fan Studies meets High Culture”

• Too much policing of boundary of popular culture – validating popular culture forgot to study high culture, and left it to literary criticism
• Modes of cultural participation set it off from fan studies that are devoted to high culture – Shakespeare, Jane Austen, book clubs etc.
• How to bring participatory culture into the study of literary classics (work for MacArthur Foundation on new media literacies and young people)